Honest comparisons

SRTD vs ChatGPT (and Claude, and Gemini)

General-purpose AI tools can write you a case note. SRTD writes one an NDIS auditor signs off on - in the format your role needs, with the participant on file, and Australian data residency.

The headline

ChatGPT writes a serviceable note. SRTD writes a note an NDIS auditor signs off on.

FeatureSRTD ToolsChatGPT / Claude / Gemini
Uses "participant" not "client" or "patient" by defaultAlwaysIf you remember to ask
Knows STAR, SOAP, NDIS Phone Log formats out of the boxYesYou have to teach it each time
Australian data residency (Sydney + Melbourne)AWS Bedrock AUUS servers
Goal-linked documentation aligned to NDIS Practice StandardsYesGeneric output
Saves notes against participant recordsYesChat history only
Structural checks aligned with NDIA requirementsYesNo
Cross-tool participant memory (notes, comms, budget all share context)YesNo
Voice memo → structured NDIS note in 30 secondsYesPossible with effort
Monthly cost$25 (Bundle)~$30 AUD
Billable time unlocked / monthHeadline~50 hrs across a 30-participant caseload (admin freed + billable work)Not framed this way

The honest verdict

If you're willing to write a custom prompt, paste it every time, and trust US servers with your participants' details, ChatGPT can write you a passable note. But it doesn't know NDIS, doesn't store anything against participant names, and doesn't catch the NDIS-specific issues an auditor would flag. SRTD is designed for this exact job. The Australian data residency part is genuinely important - under the Privacy Act 1988, sending participant information offshore creates risk most SCs aren't aware they're taking.

Try it free for 14 days. Decide for yourself.

No credit card. Full access to every tool you turn on. Cancel or switch products any time.

Built in Sydney · Australian data residency · By a working Support Coordinator