Compare

How SRTD compares to everything else

Honest, line-by-line comparisons against the closest alternatives. We'll tell you when the other product is better - and exactly when SRTD pulls ahead.

SRTD vs

Clio Care

The most direct competitor. We both do AI case notes - SRTD also does Comms, Budget, Document Analysis, Plan Review, and Reports.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

Your CRM

ShiftCare, Astalty, Brevity, SupportAbility, Lumary. They run your business; SRTD handles the writing. Most users keep both.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini

You can absolutely use ChatGPT for notes. Here's what changes when you do.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

Writing it yourself

Your biggest competitor isn't another AI tool. It's Word templates and Sunday admin. Here's exactly what changes.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

Hiring a VA

A VA costs $200-$400/month and isn't qualified to author your participants' case notes. SRTD costs $25 and helps you do it yourself in seconds.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

Hiring a specialist SC

Specialist Support Coordinators charge ~$200/hr for plan review prep. Three hours is typical. Plan Review is $20.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

Excel / Google Sheets

Tracking participant budgets in Excel? Sheet rot, formula errors, and 'the file is on Sarah's laptop' are real costs.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

Reading every PDF yourself

20 minutes per document times 30 documents a month is 10 unbillable hours. The tool costs $20.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

Brevity

Brevity handles claims, billing, and PRODA. SRTD handles the writing. They sit alongside each other - they don't replace each other.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

MYP

MYP is a flexible CRM with NDIS bolt-ons. SRTD is purpose-built for the writing job NDIS workers do every day.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

CareView

CareView handles claims, statements, and billing. SRTD handles the case notes, comms and documents that feed them.

Read comparison

SRTD vs

Astalty

Astalty runs your caseload like a business. SRTD writes the content the caseload produces. Many SCs run both.

Read comparison

All comparisons

Pick the one you're weighing up

Switch between the tables - or open the full page for the longer verdict on any of them.

The headline

Clio Care does notes well. SRTD does notes + five other things for the same kind of money.

FeatureSRTD ToolsClio Care
AI case note generator (all roles)YesSupport Worker focus
SC-specific note formats (STAR, Phone Log, NDIA Call Log)YesNo
Voice-to-note via phone recordingYesYes
Comms Tool (provider, plan manager, family emails)YesNo
Writing-style profiles (drafts in your voice)Trained on samples you pasteNo
Budget Tool (per-participant NDIS funding tracking)YesNo
Document Analysis (NDIS plans, FCAs, BSPs)YesNo
Plan Review pack generatorYesNo
NDIS Report Writer (Implementation, Progress, Pre-reassessment)Coming soon4 basic reports
Australian data residency (Sydney + Melbourne)YesYes
Free trial14 days - long enough to decide; we don't think you need 6 months6 months
Money-back guarantee on subscription30 days, no questionsNo
Built by a working Support CoordinatorYesNo
Entry price$25/mo (Bundle: notes + comms)$12/mo (notes only)
Billable time unlocked / monthHeadline~50 hrs across a 30-participant caseload (admin freed + billable work)Not framed this way

The honest verdict

If all you ever do is write Support Worker progress notes, Clio Care is a perfectly good option. If you're a Support Coordinator who also writes provider emails, reviews budgets monthly, analyses NDIS documents, prepares plan reviews for the 2026 rules, or writes implementation reports - SRTD is the only product on the market that does all of that for less than what most CRMs charge for a single user seat.

Want to skip the comparisons?

14-day free trial. No credit card. Try the suite on your own caseload - that's the real comparison.

Start free trial →